Friday, March 16, 2007

of time

elizabeth grosz, or as i asume she would be affectionately be known as friends EG, has written a book called "the Nick of time"

1. the book focuses on the philosophy of darwin, Nietzsche, and Henri Bergson. She connects the ideas of these thinkers by suggesting they each deal with time in a similar, and complex way. She looks at their concepts of evolution, will, and duration, respectively. Each thinker finds a nick in time, a important delay to time, that is very much a part of time.

2. Sexual difference & desire will always expand. Species always become more complex, they never simplify. there will be more sexes, and genders & sexualities, never less. never reduced.

3. She ends the book with a discussion on politics the future. She is against ideals, against notions of goals to reach per se. these try to draw up a state future, one that condemns itself to death - one that needs no longer evolve. For her we dream the future & think the past in order to change the present alone. Once the present is changed, as it always does so, possibility finds new dimensions, and ideas reform. New memories emerge & others are forgotten.

4. The last two points supose that this is true because cultural & social systems are extensions of the same evolution that lead to the development of life itself. political arguements evolve in much the same way people or languages do.


its an interesting book - its got me thinking. I don t quite agree with all she has to say, but in the same instance i do think that she has hit the nail on the head. My thoughts should follow

2 comments:

Muzbot said...

Am looking forward to your thoughts... "Time" and "thinking" are two great notions for us to ponder. Does she propose that evolution is brought about only by thoughts or desires?

puppet said...

no, she isn't a social constructivist, though you can see the influence in her work. She is a phenomologist, so for her time is a thing out there for us to grasp & understand through our thoughts on it. through our desires of what we'd like to see. But it is simply not of our thoughts, and some ways of conceptualising it are better than others.

time is something we cannot get to, oddly it is some what antithetical to measurement... mmm... ill find a good quote